Editorial: Federalist critique of D203 equity training a dangerous distraction
March 8, 2021
Last week, The Federalist, a national conservative online magazine, published a story claiming that a Feb. 26 Naperville District 203 equity training was an “attack” on teachers, specifically white ones. The article was constructed using information leaked to the publication by a staff member from our very own school, who is identified in the story only as a “whistleblower.” The article makes the case that an acknowledgement of and efforts to address systemic racism leads to further discrimination. In addition to making several absurd claims, the article also essentially denies the existence of white privilege or racial injustices within the school system, even going so far as to place terms like antiracism in quotation marks to indicate that they are figurative language.
Momentarily setting its troubled content aside, it must be said that we have seldom seen the lines of opinion and news so horrifically blurred together. As mentioned, there’s the continuous weaponization of punctuation, where quotation marks are used to emphasize an indignation toward opposing beliefs. Loaded language is often used with little context added, and a strategically-worded clickbait headline is used to provoke and mislead readers: “Illinois Teachers Shamed For Color Of Their Skin In Taxpayer-Sponsored ‘Antiracist’ Training.”
Though Central Times recognizes the right of any publication to align with any ideology and exercise their free speech, at its core, this article is extremely one-sided and deceptive. In fact, the results of an anonymous survey, provided to CT by school administration, showed that 140 of the 146 Central staff who responded agreed that the institute’s content “increased [their] knowledge and ability to better perform in [their] role.”
The problematic article, penned by Gabe Kaminsky, amplifies the charged arguments made by the whistleblower. The whistleblower calls on us to “look at the children as individuals,” and in that, we completely agree. But because an individual’s identity is composed of their race, religion, heritage, gender, sexual orientation, experiences, etc., things they have no control over, it is important to not disregard these facets of their identity. This is exactly what antiracist training teaches.
Another unsubstantiated claim from the whistleblower: “they are saying that if you are white, you are racist and have white privilege. Even if you say you are not racist, you are told you are.” Nowhere does equity training specifically equate being white to being racist; it is the lack of awareness and conscious effort to fight discrimination that creates racism. The colorblind approach to race and ethnicity is now largely seen as a skin-deep dismissal of the problem rather than a friendly acceptance of all people, regardless of their race.
From our vantage point, the inherent harm in antiracism training is that it might make the trainees uncomfortable. And yet, uncomfortable is an underwhelming word to describe how many of our marginalized students feel at Central on a regular basis. Perhaps you’re aware of the incidents that have been rightfully picked up by national news media, such as when, two years ago, a Naperville Central student posted islamophobic comments on their Snapchat to “commemorate” 9/11, or last year, when a Naperville Central student posted a Craigslist advertisement designating a Black student as a “slave for sale.” Others go unaddressed. At our school, a teacher can—and did—say “chink” (a racial slur) in front of a Chinese student without reprimand, while another teacher recently defended a colleague’s use of the n-word during a meeting.
When these events occur, both students and staff members are typically too afraid to report them, which contributes to an already suffocating air of silence in our schools. This anonymous whistleblower who felt they couldn’t speak their mind to district administrators only further highlights the asphyxiating culture here. Therefore, the problem we should address isn’t antiracism training like Kaminsky claims, but a lack of open discourse, which the equity institute actually provided for.
The Central Times commends Naperville District 203’s efforts to provide educators and staff with ongoing equity training and vehemently denounces Kaminsky’s article and its attempt to sell us ideology as fact. It is the acknowledgement of disparities within our community and a united effort to alleviate those inequities that will ultimately lead to fewer incidents of racism and discrimination, helping more students succeed in their learning environment.
Despite being a moderately conservative community, Naperville by and large recognizes the legacy of race in this country, and the work our school district and city council has started reflects a collective will to address that narrative. We should not feel guilty or confused by the oversimplified, harmful views of a tiny minority, because those opinions have been blown out of proportion by underhanded means. We are all obligated to stand by our progress, march forward without fear and fix the issues of the day. Only then can we, in the words of the whistleblower, “create a society that works together, a society that has the values that our country was founded on.”
Jesse L. Amerson • Mar 11, 2021 at 5:55 am
With deftness and insight Author Dianielle Pritchard makes the convincing case that Naperville 203 does indeed deserve a national spotlight for the recent sensitivity training. That light shines brilliantly on a student body, district faculty and administration with the courage and clarity to have difficult conversations on implicit bias that holds us all back from from the goal of creating a more just, open and human society for everyone. It’s clear District 203 is doing an outstanding job preparing our children to be the leaders of tomorrow. My tax dollars are being well spent. Go Redhawks!
Scarlett • Mar 10, 2021 at 1:20 pm
This article makes me wish I didn’t attend this school. Thank goodness I’m moving this summer.
What this slanted article fails to report on is the fact that this district labeled half of America “racist” to a near Ku Klux Klan level simply for supporting their former President Trump. Naperville Central, and all of District 203 for that matter, is no longer a safe space for conservative students to share their opinions, feelings, or view points.
Will Devin • Mar 10, 2021 at 4:35 am
It is interesting but not surprising that the moderators are not allowing the comments that disagree with this article to be posted. Let’s see if this makes it, we will report back. Lol.
Booker T. Washington once famously said:
“There is another class of coloured people who make a business of keeping the troubles, the wrongs, and the hardships of the black race before the public. Having learned that they are able to make a living out of their troubles, they have grown into the settled habit of advertising their wrongs — partly because they want sympathy and partly because it pays. Some of these people do not want the black folk to lose his grievances, because they do not want to lose their jobs.”
Booker T. Washington (a black man)
kelly gonzalez • Mar 10, 2021 at 4:30 am
The pandering here is comical. White people telling other white people they are racist, white supremacy, white privilege blah blah, wow! You people are consumed with race, yet you probably never spent more than a day with other races. You have no clue as to how many people of different races get along well everyday. The country is bigger than your community, btw that sees the highest murders of black on black crime THAN ANYWHERE. I guess this is my fault too? If you think America is racist, try living in another country, you will quickly find we are well ahead of almost all countries on this topic. Furthermore, why are you blaming only white people? All races have racist people. If you do not know or believe that you are truly misguided and ignorant. Humans are inherently tribal too. For you too only point your misguided finger at one race, is a complete miss and only divides people more. You have zero credibility with this ignorant argument. What you think is the right way is really far off the mark. I can tell many of you have never truly lived among other cultures or races, therefore you have this extreme guilt. Listen, people need to be responsible, parents are RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR CHILDREN. Let’s start the focus at home and on the family. When you have 70% of kids born out of wedlock, you will have a continual cycle of the same negative things. STOP BLAMING OTHER PEOPLE AND TAKE RESPONSIBILITY OF YOUR OWN LIVES. America is great, but you folks are on the verge of lunacy. And lastly, I AM FREE TO HAVE MY OWN OPINION. YOU PEOPLE ARE SO INSANELY INTOLERANT OF OTHERS THAT DISAGREE WITH YOU SO YOU CANCEL THEM, THIS ONLY LEADS TO MORE DIVISION AND EVENTUALLY MUCH WORSE AND THE OUTCOME WILL NOT BE GOOD FOR ALL.
Cornelius Brown • Mar 10, 2021 at 4:11 am
MAGA
Sam • Mar 9, 2021 at 11:38 am
This article is comical. Looking at and judging each individual first and foremost on the basis of the color of his or her skin is racist. Full stop.
Promoting stereotypes and painting diverse groups of individuals with wide brush strokes is racist. Full Stop.
Infantilizing people of color, and asserting they lack agency due to the color of their skin is racist. Full stop.
“Critical Race Training” and “Antiracist Training” are not “racial sensitivity training.” The fact that you’ve deleted my comment shows how toxic this ideology is, and how the purveyors of it seek to silence any intellectual debate on the topic. This is the antithesis of an education, and proof that the teachers are failing their students.
Sam • Mar 9, 2021 at 11:11 am
This article is comical. Looking and judging each individual first and foremost on the basis of the color of his or her skin is racist. Full stop.
Promoting stereotypes and painting diverse groups of individuals with wide brush strokes is racist. Full Stop.
Infantilizing people of color, and asserting they lack agency due to the color of their skin is racist. Full stop.
“Critical Race Training” and “Antiracist Training” is not “racial sensitivity training.”
Steve • Mar 9, 2021 at 10:50 am
Here’s the simple truth – if the content of Ms. Simmons keynote and the related presentation was not divisive and/or controversial, there’d be no need for a whistleblower to shine a light on it. It would be public so the entire 203 community could review, discuss, and make decisions for themselves. The fact that it’s not speaks volumes.
L. Campbell • Mar 8, 2021 at 12:14 pm
Thank you for this well-written piece!
Amanda McMillen • Mar 8, 2021 at 11:32 am
Very well said, Danielle. Thank you so much for elevating your perspective on this so eloquently.
Carrie Lavine • Mar 8, 2021 at 11:13 am
Thank you for responding to the article with wise words and factual information. I found the use of the term Whistle Blower ridiculous. If this employee felt the need to “leak” this “information”, surely they would choose to speak out loud to the public and the school district. That’s how you share concerns if you truly have creditable and verifiable issues. Otherwise, it’s not whistle blowing, it’s cherry-picking to get people riled up about a non-issue.